Now then, an important thing to note is modal spells, notably ]. So the end result is that one of the umbras is sacrificed to save Selkie, and the other is destroyed. Yes, because Totem armor is a replacement effect happening at the same time as it is being called to be destroyed. So, if those enchantment auras granting totem armor are also being destroyed, do they still protect the creature in question? They miswrote, and are referring to ], which destroys all artifacts, creatures, and enchantments. In this case, the creature is called to be destroyed along with the enchantment, but totem armor has a replacement effect and protects the creature while being sacrificed. Doesn't matter what order they are written in unless the card specifically says "then" or something to that effect. With regards to other, non-modal spells, they all happen at once and not sequentially like Austere Command. Also, as a side note, this means artifact creatures that have regenerate must be regenerated twice if the artifact and appropriate CMC mode is chosen. That means in this situation listed, the enchantments are destroyed before being able to be used to save the creature they are enchanting. It would, technically, resolve as things are written (even though most of the time it functionally means everything is destroyed at once). So, you would be correct with regards to carrying out "in the order listed" if this card were Austere Command, as it is modal and you choose the effects.
0 kommentar(er)
